Notice of Online Archive

  • This page is no longer being updated and remains online for informational and historical purposes only. The information is accurate as of the last page update.

    For questions about page contents, contact the Communications Division.

Traditionally strong as problem-solvers, engineers are now also problem-finders. The increasingly interconnected, global world demands that engineers not only have an excellent technical skill-set, but also mastery of a broader range of skills. Engineers are called upon as never before to have a deep understanding and appreciation of the scientific, social, artistic, and humanistic aspects of engineering and the world in which they live.

Lafayette is responding to these evolving needs.

Asad Akram '13, left, and Christopher Costantino '12 work in a lab in Acopian Engineering Center.

Asad Akram ’13, left, and Christopher Costantino ’12 work in a lab in Acopian Engineering Center.

“Our vision is to provide engineering students not only with an outstanding technical education but also with opportunities to pursue innovative collaborations with faculty and students from all disciplines at the College,” says Scott Hummel, Interim Jeffers Director of the Engineering Division.

Hummel is very clear on the main reason why: “We are teaching our students to be innovators and leaders.

“The technical elements of their degree are critical, but so are other skillsbeing able to work in and lead a cross-functional team, having an understanding and appreciation of perspectives beyond the technical,” he says. “The disciplines are important, but when they are combined with leadership, innovation, and broad perspective, the education we provide creates endless opportunities for our students. These abilities are transferable and will serve our students from their entry-level position to the CEO’s office.”

The data support Hummel’s vision for engineering as Lafayette is ranked No. 6 among its peers in the percentage of alumni who are executives or directors of companies with sales of $1 million or more as listed in the 2012 Standard & Poor’s Register.

Another reason for emphasizing an engineering education that goes beyond the purely technical is the challenge graduates face in competing in a global marketplace.

From left Brian Peacock '12, Laurie Caslake, associate professor and head of biology, Arthur Kney, associate professor and head of civil and environmental engineering, and Annie Mikol '13 are using bacteria to improve the water quality of wetlands.

From left Brian Peacock ’12, Laurie Caslake, associate professor of biology, Arthur Kney, associate professor and head of civil and environmental engineering, and Annie Mikol ’13 are using bacteria to improve the water quality of wetlands.

“North American engineering schools don’t have an advantage over their overseas counterparts in educating students in the fundamentals of engineering. After all, thermodynamics is the same here as on the other side of the globe,” Hummel says. “But our engineering graduates expect to earn up to five times more than their counterparts from India and China.”

Graduates from North American engineering schools do command salaries five times that of their foreign counterparts, which is due to much more than technical expertise. Technical expertise can be had worldwide at a fraction of the cost.

“Companies can email technical and computational problems across the globe to be solved and have the solution the next morning,” Hummel says. “Employers want students who can innovate and lead. Our students are looking at the broad issues and implication of engineering, not just the technical aspects. They get hired as innovators, and that’s why we have so many grads in such high places.”

To ensure that Lafayette provides engineering students with the best possible education, engineering faculty are implementing initiatives, with the encouragement of Provost Wendy Hill, that emerged from the work of faculty study groups and from an engineering division retreat following an external review of engineering programs in spring 2011. Chaired by the vice president for research at the University of Vermont who previously founded the Smith College engineering program, the review team also included the vice provost of the University of California, Berkeley; the dean of engineering at Dartmouth College; and the retired executive vice president for innovation and technology of IBM.

The goals of the engineering division center on two key thrusts.

Shane Chalupa '12 examines the College's racecar after a few test laps. He was part of the team that planned, constructed, and raced a car in the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) international competition.

Shane Chalupa ’12 examines the College’s racecar after a few test laps. He was part of the team that planned, constructed, and raced a car in the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) international competition.

1. Integrating engineering and the liberal arts programs through multidisciplinary curricular initiatives. Increasing multidisciplinary opportunities for engineering students will be accomplished through a proposed new center that will serve as a hub for initiatives in entrepreneurship and leadership. The center will house projects that focus on innovation and range from design to research and development. Hummel emphasizes that “the center is not an engineering initiative, it’s a College initiative.” The center will bring together students and faculty from all programs at the College. Although engineering is an essential element of the center, projects are not limited to those that include engineering students and faculty. Estimates are that one-third of the student body will be involved and it may reach 50 percent once the center is fully established.

2. Adding curricular flexibility to allow students to explore other fields, both within and outside engineering. The current curriculum allows engineering students to take up to 22 percent of their courses outside of the STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, and math). This is restrictive as compared to many programs at both Lafayette’s peer institutions and at Ph.D.-granting institutions. The change will allow students to take up to one-third of their courses in the liberal arts, but will not require them to do so.

The changes are aligned with the longstanding traditions and mission of the College. Lafayette engineers have always been regarded in industry, business, research, and graduate schools as technically competent and as well-rounded innovators. The changes will ensure this reputation for the future.

WATERED DOWN? NO.

In response to questions about whether engineering content in the curriculum is being de-emphasized, Hummel says, “Not at all.” Lafayette is on par with the nation’s top engineering schools by all of these key measures:

  • 144 Credit equivalents in degree program
  • 72% Required STEM and engineering project courses in the curriculum
  • 2,000+ Contact hours between students and faculty over four years

INVESTING IN THE CORE

  • Two new faculty lines added in the last six years; one filled and search under way for second
  • Four faculty position searches under way
  • Jeffers Director of the Engineering Division endowed by generosity of an anonymous donor; authority strengthened with overwhelming support of engineering faculty
  • Engineering complex completely renovated in 2003, including replacement of older lab equipment
Categorized in: Academic News, Alumni, Engineering, Faculty and Staff, News and Features, Students

4 Comments

  1. David M. Skvoretz '95 says:

    I think up to 22% of courses outside STEM is enough. Raising it to 33% will produce less qualified engineering students, because of the STEM courses they will not receive. I enjoyed and remember many of my non-STEM courses from my days at Lafayette. But my employer hired and has promoted me for my engineering skills, not my ancillary knowledge of liberal arts.

    Also I think the statement that “Companies can email technical and computational problems across the globe to be solved and have the solution the next morning,” is an exaggeration. That may be true at some Fortune 500 engineering companies that have an overseas engineering presence. But that is not true for the vast majority of US companies that employ engineers. That said I agree that innovation and leadership are important value added skills that Lafayette Engineering programs help nurture in their students.

    1. Scott Hummel, Director of Engineering says:

      The required STEM content after the curricular revision will total approximately three quarters of the courses taken by students. This figure is in line with the top engineering schools in the country. The percentage of courses with significant liberal arts content and focus will be approximately 33%. At first glance this doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t add to 100%. The new design project courses will be offered through the multidisciplinary center and will retain the deep level of engineering design and analysis that they have had for years, but, they will also include entrepreneurial and economic considerations, among other societal and humanistic impacts.

  2. Robert Quiel says:

    How can my son, Trevor Quiel, get involved in this program?
    He is a 3rd year chemical engineering student. He has yet to get engaged in a collaboration of this type. How can we get him engaged?

    Thanks for your help,
    Rob Quiel

    1. Scott Hummel, Director of Engineering says:

      Each of the Bachelor of Science Engineering programs at Lafayette are in the process of moving their senior projects into the multidisciplinary arena. Although most of the projects are departmentally focused at this time, several ongoing projects are multidisciplinary in nature. I suggest that Trevor contact his Department Head or academic advisor for more information on opportunities in the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department.

Comments are closed.